Thursday, November 14, 2013


Nanette Bertoni

EDUC 331 – 003

Professor Juliana Searle

November 12, 2013

Chapter 12 Reflection

My new philosophy in integrating technology into my classroom is that I will try to use it as often as possible. I have found, with the help of this class, the World Wide Web has many options as far as web sites and programs available for teachers. I have learned that web sites such as Edmodo, Padlet, and Thinkfinity can be very helpful in getting resources and using formative assessments. Also programs like Smart Notebook, Gradekeeper, and Kid Pix are great additions to a teaching tool box.

Even though I have used certain websites and programs in this class, I do not see using cloud storage. This type of storage that relies on a company that may or may not stay in business. It also assumes that the company in charge has good security to keep out hackers.

There are of course good things and bad things to consider when using technology in the classroom. Unless the technology is used effectively, it can appear to students and your boss that you are obviously not comfortable with what you are doing and will appear contrived. If a technology is infused in the daily lessons, students and teacher alike will progress better and easier through each day.

            Before this class, I used technology in a limited fashion. I have a smart phone and laptop. They are tools that I have used in specific ways. This class has helped push me into using and thinking about using other technologies in my classroom. I see now that I have resources available if I only get out of my comfort zone and look for them.

Sunday, November 3, 2013


Texture in Art

Texture in art work can be shown in different ways. Most texture is physical and visual together. Some art displays texture visually only. Rarely, because art is a visual art, texture is only physical. The following pictures of art pieces are to challenge you, sixth graders, on what you know or believe to know about texture.

 


 
 
 
George Braques, Violin and Candlestick, oil on canvas

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A light colored, old stone wall

 
 
 
 
Robin Antar, Heart Knot, marble sculpture
 




 
 
 
 
 
Glass marble

 
 
 
 
When you are given a minimum description of a piece of art, you sometimes have to make an educated guess on what kind of texture it has. In other words, you need to decide with the knowledge you know and the information you can look up what would be the best answer.

Choose one;

·        Physical

·        Visual

·        Both

Write a good paragraph, minimum of four sentences, on one of these art pieces telling me about your texture choice.



Sunday, October 6, 2013

Art: Missing In Action


 

 

Art: Missing In Action

Nanette Bertoni

October 6, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract

Our society is surrounded with art and music. We depend on them for our advertising, movies, and enjoyment. Whole industries are dependent on patrons who are reasonably literate in art to appreciate its existence. Removing art and music from our school curriculum hampers the development of art appreciation in our children. Objections to keeping art education in our schools are raised in the areas of value, funding, and time. A great number of administrators, teachers, and citizenry believe that art education is unnecessary or at least a luxury the schools can do without. They also believe that our children will have better test scores if they remove art and music and spend that time in tested subjects. Many studies have been conducted to prove that students who engage in art and music actually do better on test scores compared to children who do not engage in art education. This paper provides a summary of these studies and shows conclusively that art education helps develop a child wholly and effectively.

Art: Missing In Action

by Nanette Bertoni

            Art and music surround us. We have devices that can keep our favorite songs close at hand and have the ability to listen at a moment’s whim. People who have learned how to create music and art most likely started learning at a young age. Businesses rely on people to be creative in their approach to their jobs. They also rely on people to create the art and music that is used in advertising. These skills take time to develop. They also take inspiration to spark the interest. How do we expect art and music to continue if we do not give our children the opportunity to learn them? Children learn better and faster when they have art and music teaching them to be disciplined. They become more involved students when they have a fun reason to return to school every day. If students were more involved in school, high school graduations would increase, thus providing more federal funding for the schools budgets. With minimal cost to schools, most art and music programs can be maintained in grade schools. We cannot eliminate art and music from schools because that would be taking away tools from our children to help them succeed.

            English art historian and poet, Sir Herbert Read argued that, “. . . the aim of education ought to be conceived of as the preparation of artists” (pg. 8). The label ‘artist’ is meant as an individual who has developed the idea, imagination, and skill set to create work that is well balanced, executed masterfully, and is imaginative. The highest tributes we offer to someone are when we say that they are an artist whether as a cook, engineer, surgeon, or teacher. The fine arts do not monopolize the word artistic.

In order to create artfully crafted work, distinctive forms of thinking are needed. Again Read states, “They are relevant to virtually all aspects of what we do, from the design of curricula, to the practice of teaching, to the features of the environment in which students and teachers live” (pg. 8). Students deserve creative thinkers. Of all the forms of distinctive thinking, a couple of them are to be reviewed.

The first to consider is the act of working on a painting, creating a poem, or composing a musical score. The musician composes harmonies among practically uncountable numbers of possible sound configurations. A painter’s task is similar in that the artist needs to see their work and be able to make judgments about them. Being able to make judgments about quality is not dependent on a formula. Unlike arithmetic which has correct answers that can be proven, the arts require a judgment. The arts teach attention to nuance and the need to rely on feelings. For instance, the hotness or coldness of a color might be too warm or cool next to another color. A shape might be too sharp in a drawing or the percussion in a musical score might need to be more dynamic. Artists “. . . try to achieve a rightness of fit” (pg. 9).  They depend on knowledge or a sense of when the composition feels right.

Learning to ask not only what is being said but how someone has put together an argument, an image, or a musical score is what students need to know most. Most of our perception is highly visceral. A visitor to a gallery may pace back and forth while viewing a painting. This example shows an effort of someone trying to concentrate on both focal awareness and the consideration of design. Teachers carry out activities such as this, being able to focus on an individual while looking after the classroom as a whole. These patterns in the classroom change over time and a good teacher must pay attention to many operations at the same time.

Another form of thinking is that not all that is knowable can be expressed in theoretical form. Our intellectual activities have limits and cannot be defined by the limits of our language. John Dewey tells us that the meaning in science is expressed in actual words, whereas the arts connote meaning. We use expressive form to say something that language literally cannot convey. We build shrines to express our sorrow or pride. We use poetry when we bury someone or partake in marriage. We need to remember that when we perform a task, including science, it can have an artful ending.

In the end, the arts are a special form of experience. When touched by one of the arts, there is a sense of energy or we feel the surge of emotion which can stimulate an appetite for learning. In this respect, education can look to the arts as a model. Our world does not concede to single correct answers to questions or have clear-cut solutions to problems. We need to be able to envision new options; we need to have a feel for a situation when it appears. Our schools need to create a culture of placing importance on exploration and not just discovery. Perhaps place more value to surprise than control. Placing more value on the imaginative help schools become what they are meant to be. The final destination should not be the only focus for our schools. We need to foster ideas and imaginations so that our children may become better equipped thinkers and future leaders.

Art and music should stay in our schools because we want our children to be educated in both. Data and research has shown that test scores are higher when children are involved in art education. We need to create children who can do more than pass tests. We must help children become better citizens. Doing this we will have a more productive society in the future. We will have a society that can think creatively.

References

Eisner, Elliot W. (2002). WHAT CAN EDUCATION LEARN FROM THE ARTS ABOUT THE PRACTICE OF EDUCATION?. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 18(1), 4.

Monday, September 23, 2013

The Perils of Copyright Law


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Perils of Copyright Law
Nanette Bertoni
September 23, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
           
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract
This paper explores my personal view on education in the Unites States and its thorny relationship with copyright law. The question being asked today in the twenty-first century is, “Is the copyright law in America a hindrance to education?” I will say “yes” to this question. I will point out that copyright law has become so bloated with legalism and economic self-interest that teachers are in danger of breaking the law if they do not appropriately “cough up the fees” when referencing work or information produced and or gathered by another party.

The Perils of Copyright Law
by Nanette Bertoni
            Imagine a classroom today if the teacher demanded that each and every student, with their parents, had to pay for access to information presented. To add insult to injury, students and parents would be forbidden to share the learned information to anyone outside of their family. Instead of coming to class eager to learn, students would be only permitted to enter when the fee was paid at the door and legal documents signed.  Poor families and children would be denied access to basic information. These families then would not be able to read the documents required to obtain access to the information.
            David Wiley in his article Openness as Catalyst for an Educational Reformation said, “For the authors of content, resources, courseware, or textbooks, being open is about overcoming the inner two-year old who constantly screams: “Mine! You can’t have it! It’s MINE!” Unfortunately, modern law and college/university policy tend to enable this bad behavior, allowing us to shout “Mine!” ever more loudly, to stomp our feet with ever less self-control, and to hit each other with ever harder and sharper toys. Throughout our tantrums, society soothingly whispers that unbridled selfishness is a natural and therefore appropriate feeling” (p. 16). He clearly implies that our society has been reduced to two year old behavior when it comes to our creations in art and literature.
            The educational system in this country has not helped the situation. Many administrators and teachers failed to speak up and challenge copyright laws that where being modified and created. Again David Wiley stated, “If a teacher is not sharing what he or she knows, there is no education happening. In fact, those educators who share the most thoroughly of themselves with the greatest proportion of their students are the ones we deem successful… Education is sharing” (p. 16). Why then have we allowed the prevailing selfish behavior of seemingly unending restrictions imposed by copyright law? Let us look at this from an historical perspective.
            In Lawrence Lessig’s article Getting Our Values around Copyright Law, he quotes another author saying, “At the turn of the century [1900], U.S. copyright law was technical, inconsistent, and difficult to understand, but it didn’t apply to very many people or very many things” (p. 28). He again quotes, “Ninety years later, the U.S. copyright law is even more technical, inconsistent, and difficult to understand; more importantly, it touches everyone and everything. . .” (p. 28). It would appear that copyright law has not improved with time. The only thing that has changed is that it affects almost everyone and everything.
            If copyright law is detrimental to education, why is it allowed? The answer is complicated. I believe that indeed selfishness is a factor but also protection from someone else making a profit on one’s own work is a key factor. In trying to protect the creator from being taken advantage of by a non scrupulous person, we have gone overboard in the laws created.
            Without sharing knowledge, we remain ignorant. Allowing information sharing, without fees, in an educational setting would greatly improve an overburdening system. Education continues to struggle with ever shrinking budgets and copyright laws continue to make access to information more difficult and fiscally out of reach.
            Change happens slowly. With the creation of the Creative Commons project, information and knowledge is being made available free of charge. Authors and artists are giving their creations to this project for the purpose of sharing. So perhaps what we learned as children can be put into practice, “Share your toys and be nice to each other.” Sharing is a good thing and knowledge is for everyone.